Get the story here.

Now, for my thoughts.

Geez, talking as he does about a “struggle” against the Jewish state of Israel, he sounds just like Adolf Hitler, blaming the Jews for the problems of the Muslims, refusing to accept that their problems are their own doing. Cue the violin music.

And, really, of course Osama knows full well that there isn’t, never was and never will be a “Palestine”. He’s not stupid, no matter how monstrously evil he is. Yet he propagates this Big Lie just as did Yasser Arafat, who himself did so as a pawn of the KGB. What, is Osama bin Laden himself also a pawn of the KGB? Does the KGB issue orders to Osama, giving him talking points via its hand up the dummy’s hiney?

Indeed. Is Osama bin Laden actually not a Muslim, as Arafat wasn’t a Muslim? Is he a KGB stooge? Is he on Vlad Putin’s speed dial? Surely these are legitimate questions, though the ignorant will not understand why I’m asking these questions.

After all, it’s true that the KGB is the primary blameworthy party when it comes to conflict in the Middle East. It goes back to the beginning of terrorism; the KGB invented terrorism, actually.

It wouldn’t surprise me to learn one day that Osama bin Laden is just another Yasser Arafat, though of a different flavor and without the phony smile and false assurances of wanting peace. I guess the KGB decided that the nice-guy act wasn’t working, so they wanted to create a devil such as we see in bin Laden today.

As was Arafat, I believe that bin Laden is a pawn of Russia, who wants the Middle East’s oil for herself. Russia sees Israel as a roadblock to controlling the Middle East, what with being a staunch ally of America and the rest of the Free World. Russia wants to get rid of Israel, but doesn’t want to be seen as such, doesn’t want to risk being blamed by the world as such, doesn’t want to risk being hit by Israel’s nukes in retaliation... so Russia has been using the region’s Arabs/Muslims as literally disposable pawns (think of all the homicide bombings and so on) in a massive Big Lie propaganda campaign against Israel, precisely as the Nazis wrought against the Jews of Germany.

Perhaps bin Laden isn’t quite another Hitler, though there are indeed striking parallels. Rather, bin Laden is a puppet, a pawn. He’s being used.

Food for thought. Things aren’t always as they appear. We must delve deeper to find the truth. After all, this bin Laden guy is, without a doubt, a very mysterious entity.

I’m not making this up. Not at all. I kid you not. Canadians’ pets actually can get far better healthcare than their owners. Incredibly, the law in Canada prevents Canadians from receiving the same excellent standard of care in Canada as their pets can receive.

Canada has a purely socialized, state-funded and -delivered health care system, called “Medicare”.

It’s actually against the law in Canada to pay for one’s medical attention in the private sector, at least for the type of medical attention deemed by the state to be “medically necessary”.

Unfortunately, although the socialized healthcare system in Canada is “free” (actually paid for by Canadians’ taxes), one is lucky if one can actually get any care at all, and frequently must wait ridiculously long time periods to get even lifesaving care, including, for example, diagnosis and treatment of cancer. People do sometimes actually die due to having to wait for critically required attention and treatment, with their conditions becoming progressively worse and their suffering intensifying. I know this for a fact, having witnessed it firsthand. Once patients finally receive their attention, it may well be too late, and if only we had a system that worked for everyone, in which lifesaving attention and treatment were given quickly, lives may be saved rather than sacrificed at the altar of socialism and left-wing political correctness.

Here is a good article discussing this socialized healthcare system, which, besides in Canada, is only seen in two other countries, namely North Korea and Cuba, both Communist dictatorships with no freedom, no human rights and no rule of law. Strange that Canada, of all countries, still has this kind of system.

I’m sorry to say to the zealous proponents of a purely socialized medical care system, but it’s painfully unreliable and actually deadly. No amount of cash infusion in the future will help.

The only bright spot I can see is in the emergency rooms, where, if a patent shows up with what appears to be an imminently life-threatening condition, they’re seen immediately. However, even given a life-threatening condition such as cancer, the shocking truth is that, no, the system will not move fast enough to save all saveable lives. This is the terrible reality of “rationing”, which is an inevitable part of any socialist system of anything.

The solution: A workable balance between public/private funding and delivery is critically required. Nothing that has already been done to try to “save” the Medicare system has worked, no amount of money, no amount of tinkering, of innovation, etc. It’s only gotten worse and continues to worsen whilst Canadians suffer needlessly and sometimes even die for lack of required medical attention, due to the failure of supply to come anywhere near meeting demand (but then again, as it’s a socialist system, is this any surprise?).

“Best health care system in the world”? Oh, really? If so, then God help the rest of the world!

Canada can, and must, do better.

Via Canada’s most popular blog, Small Dead Animals...

Amazingly, a group of Muslim students who tried to have the Canadian magazine MacLean’s prosecuted for carrying an article they didn’t like, and who lost their bid to have the Ontario “Human Rights” Commission prosecute (persecute, actually, as the “Human Rights” Commissions operate outside of Canada’s constitution and Charter of Rights and Freedoms, believe it or not!) MacLean’s and controversial author Mark Steyn, are bizarrely attempting to “settle” their action thereagainst, as if they were in a position of strength and righteousness from which to make such a demand. Incredible.

For those curious about Canada, I’d say that following such strange goings-on in this supposedly “developed”, “just” society will lead the beholder to conclude that, indeed, Canada’s reality, as any nation’s reality, is as curious and puzzling as can be, to say the least!

As a Canadian myself, I can easily say that my country and society are rife with contradictions that baffle the mind. There’s no shortage of bizarre, weird double- and multiple standards all over the place. As one can see from following the free speech and “human rights” issues via the links above, Canada has her work cut out for her when it comes to reconciling actual state apparatus practice with what the Constitution and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms actually say. In other words, in this example, when Canadians are told by their sacred documents that they have the inalienable right to freedom of expression, it must be enforced that this will actually be the case and that the state apparatus not violate this right. Ditto the right to presumption of innocence and the right to a fair trial.

Unfortunately, in the case of the Muslim students, MacLean’s, Mark Steyn and the Ontario “Human Rights” Commission, the OHRC only refused to hear the case, citing “no jurisdiction”, because it was too terrified of the negative publicity certain to ensue should it proceed with the case. If the OHRC had actually felt that it could persecute MacLean’s and Mr. Steyn without any public/media scrutiny/criticism/outrage, they would, I believe, have gone ahead, as “Human Rights” Commissions in Canada have tended to do in the past when they believed they’d be permitted to be above the law, above the Constitution, above the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, above everything, as if some kind of gods...

In a nutshell, if we’re going to have any state apparatus nodes (they’re expensive, by the way, and their existence is highly questionable, as is their raison d’etre in this day and age of great equality and tolerance for which Canada is now famous the world over) purporting to stand up for everyone’s human rights (particularly as explicitly indicated in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms), they must actually do so with maximum scrupulousness and equitability and always refrain from violating anyone’s rights. Today this isn’t the case, unfortunately, and this is why Canada is embroiled in this historic civil conflict over our guaranteed rights and the arrogant, maverick, fascist state apparatus nodes and their possibly-brainwashed apparatchik employees who wrongly believe they can violate them.

I believe this Canadian civil conflict can serve as a valuable lesson to all countries in the world as well.

CNS.com reports:

Black Pro-Lifers Protest Planned Parenthood, Criticize Obama

Washington (CNSNews.com) - A group of black pro-lifers joined a protest outside a Planned Parenthood clinic here on Thursday, calling for an end to federal funding of the abortion provider and expressing opposition to Sen. Barack Obama’s (D-Ill.) pro-abortion stance.

(...)

“If (Obama) supports abortion, which is a scourge of our community, which is devastating our community, then we cannot, we must not, support him,”

(...)

The rally was in response to recent reports by a student publication at UCLA which released recorded telephone conversations in which a purported donor offered to make contributions for race-targeted abortions to some Planned Parenthood offices and representatives of those offices agreed to accept them. Planned Parenthood later apologized, stating it was not their policy to accept race-targeted donations.

I’ve previously blogged about Planned Parenthood’s racist, genocidal reality and of its founder, Margaret Sanger’s, racist ideology.

Some more interesting reading on Planned Parenthood, its origins and racist/genocidal ideology is found at The Black Sentinel.

I oppose abortion, especially later-term. And I will not apologize for this opposition, nor will I apologize for calling Planned Parenthood racist/genocidal. I don’t agree that abortion, which is actually the torture-to-death of human beings deemed “inconvenient” by selfish people, is a matter of “choice”. After all, no one has any business, nor any right, whatsoever, to deem any innocent individual or group “inconvenient” and deserving of extermination to increase the convenience of those who would support/practice such extermination. It’s no different, in my view, than any other cold-blooded murder or genocidal operation.

Granted, there are those who will vehemently condemn my opposition to such evilness. But the debate must be encouraged, the truth exposed to the light of day. And the truth of which we speak at this moment is that “Planned Parenthood” isn’t about planned parenthood at all but rather about abortion and making huge profits... and about racism/genocide.

It doesn’t surprise me to see the growing opposition to the likes of such evil “businesses” as “Planned Parenthood”, which has been falsely legitimized/legalized via unethical, immoral propaganda communications tactics since its founding by a racist and eugeneticist.

It’s really not about “helping women”. It’s about eradicating inconvenient people while making profits for its practitioners. It’s also astonishing that it’s a “charity” as well.

I believe that abortion ought to be illegal, actually, and that humane alternatives to such selfish, despaired evilness should be promoted and provided as much as possible.

I say, let the debate begin. It’s ok to make strong, unequivocal statements one way or the other as long as we keep the debate civil and rational.

Go ahead, let’s have our say. It’s our right to say what we really think, and no one has a right to intimidate us into thinking and saying what we’re told.

The photo of the attack would tend to make viewers think negative things about Tibetans and Tibet and possibly feel sympathy for the Communists.

But the attacker has been caught as his true self, marching with a group of Chinese nationalists:

This sort of thing reminds me of “Pallywood”, a propaganda organization in the geopolitical area referred to as “Palestine” whose raison d’etre is to create propaganda films with actors for the purpose of telling lies about and demonizing Israel as an unprovoked aggressor.

It also reminds me of the Chinese Communist soldiers caught with monks’ robes for the purpose of posing as Tibetan monks for infiltration and propaganda purposes.

The evidence only keeps mounting that the Communist regime of China lies about others in order to get its way.

Why should we trust the Communists of China at all, in anything? Why should we believe anything they claim? We know they lie, and lie big-time and a lot.

By The Canadian Sentinel

Is the American Democratic Party racist? If it was, and it actually was, then how do we know that it isn’t anymore? The hard questions must necessarily be asked, as the Democrats don’t seem to show any remorse for their terrible, racist, murderous past and race-card-playing present.

Something most people probably don’t know is that the American Democratic Party, ironically the party of Presidential Nomination candidate Barack Obama, is responsible for slavery and the Ku Klux Klan in America.

I have previously blogged about the fact that the Democratic Party in America is actually responsible for bringing forth the racist Ku Klux Klan.

The Democrats even have a currently sitting Senator, Robert Byrd, who has actually belonged to the Klan and who has uttered racist slurs on television. But it doesn’t appear to matter to Democrats. This I find bizarre.

The Canada Free Press is asking why doesn’t the Democratic Party of the United States take responsibility and apologize for its terrible heritage, and cites some points recommended by Lt. Colonel Frances Rice, a retired US Army officer and member of the Lincoln Heritage Institute, in an open letter to the Democratic Party (Ms. Rice is a Black Republican, incidentally). Here are some excerpts:

Whereas the Democratic Party fought to expand slavery and, after the Civil War, established Jim Crow Laws, Black Codes and other repressive legislation that were designed to disenfranchise African Americans,

Whereas the Ku Klux Klan was the terrorist arm of the Democratic Party, and their primary goal was to intimidate and terrorize African American voters, Republicans who moved South to protect African Americans and any other whites who supported them,

Whereas, according to leading historians (both black and white), the horrific atrocities committed against African Americans during slavery and Reconstruction were financed, sponsored, and promoted by the Democratic Party and their Ku Klux Klan supporters,

Whereas from 1870 to 1930, in an effort to deny African Americans their civil rights and to keep African Americans from voting Republican, thousands of African Americans were shot, beaten, lynched, mutilated, and burned to death by Ku Klux Klan terrorists from the Democratic Party,

Whereas Democratic Presidents Franklin D. Roosevelt and Harry Truman rejected anti-lynching laws and efforts to establish a permanent Civil Rights Commission(...)

So... should the Democratic Party take full responsibility and apologize for its key, dominant role in slavery and racism in the United States, and not continue to run away and try to hide from the inconvenient truth?

Subject:
Name: Charles Liu. Usual alias: Bobby Fletcher

Sex: Male

Age: Early 40s

Nationality: Taiwanese.

Residence: Issaquah, Wash., USA

Occupation: Technology consultant. Suspected agent of the Chinese government.

Activities spotlighted: Online propaganda favoring Communist regime of China and demonizing its opponents, particularly Falun Gong practitioners. Tiananmen Square massacre denial.

Propaganda sites run by Charles Liu

I recall my first encounter with this individual. I was discussing, on my blog, atrocities committed by the Communist regime of China and he appeared, as he frequently does all over the internet, to spread propaganda favoring the Communist regime. It was the first time I became aware of his existence and of the existence of online propagandists working for the Communist regime of China.

Mr. Liu has been exposed in the magazine Western Standard.

He frequently clashes online with a friend of mine, Jana Shearer (the same Jana Shearer as mentioned in the Western Standard article exposing Mr. Liu), a Falun Gong practitioner and former Epoch Times reporter. One need only do some online searches based on the names “Charles Liu” and “Jana Shearer” to quickly find some of these exchanges. It’s a worthwhile thing to do to get a picture of the online activities of Mr. Liu, perhaps the most infamous online propaganda agent of the Chinese Communist Party.

Mr. Liu recently attempted to spread propaganda on the blog of the Western Standard’s former publisher, Ezra Levant, about whom I wrote an article recently about his fight against a Canadian state apparatus agency which has grossly, dangerously overstepped its mandate and is persecuting Canadians for alleged “thought crimes”, including Mr. Levant himself.

Also of interest is this article about another suspected agent of the Chinese Communist Party and its activities.

Now, the question is begged: Why would the Chinese Communist government have to have such a massive international espionage and propaganda presence? What is it trying to hide?

Doesn’t this make one tend to disbelieve whatever the Chinese Communist government may say about anything? Why would we believe the claims of a regime who would engage in such activities as described in this article and at the links provided?

Video: Ezra Levant defiantly defends his rights to the “Canadian Human Rights Commission” (CHRC) in an opening statement in response to charges stemming from a complaint from a radical Imam who didn’t like the fact that he republished cartoons of the prophet Mohammed which were at the center of international controversy following publication in a Danish newspaper.

By The Canadian Sentinel

Believe it or not... Canada has something called the “Canadian Human Rights Commission” which, instead of promoting and protecting human rights as its name might imply, actually takes them away from individuals they wish to persecute. Rather similar to how the Communist regime of China describes its oppressive agencies as “The Peoples’...”, isn’t it?

Ezra Levant is one such victim. Watch the video above for his introduction to what he’s facing. The rest of his interrogation is available in further videos here. Note that this is the first time a CHRC interrogation was ever filmed and distributed for public view.

A recent article by Mr. Levant, who is at the forefront of the citizen battle against the fascist CHRC, discussing the inner workings of this state agency can be viewed here.

Mr. Levant’s blog has chronicled his battle since the process started a few months ago.

The whole thing came about due to a radical Imam, Syed Soharwardy, issuing a complaint to the CHRC about Mr. Levant, after having failed to convince the police to arrest him for allegedly “offending” him. Mr. Soharwardy, embarrassed with the negative reaction by Canadians to him and his actions towards Mr. Levant, withdrew his complaint, but is now going to face a lawsuit for his frivolous complaint which cost Mr. Levant thousands of dollars in legal defence fees.

Of particluar note is one Richard Warman, a former agent of the CHRC who has been found to have assumed a false identity and to have spread “hatred” on websites in an attempt to entrap those sites and pursue bogus persecutions thereagainst. Mr. Warman, after leaving the CHRC, has made a lucrative living launching bogus complaints against people he targeted, making thousands of dollars on the convictions of his victims, all of whom were found guilty based on nothing but accusation and who were denied their right to a fair trial. In fact, 100% of defendants are convicted at the CHRC.

There is also a move afoot to abolish an unconstitutional, fascist part of the “Canadian Human Rights Act” which enable the CHRC to take away peoples’ rights in order to get these phony convictions. It’s a cross-ideological, multipartisan voice, actually, that wants to stop this violation of Canadians’ human rights.

To follow this continuing battle for freedom and human rights in Canada, you may visit both Ezra Levant’s and Mark Steyn’s (Mr. Steyn is another victim of the CHRC and is also fighting for his and his magazine employer’s right to freedom of expression) websites.

Isn’t it shocking that state apparatus fascism has been happening in Canada, particularly in this day and age? Doesn’t this make freedom-loving people the world over realize that if it can happen in Canada, it can happen anywhere else?